How do I identify the current Benach Pitney Reilly practice after an older Benach Collopy referral?
The current DC site uses Benach Pitney Reilly and identifies Ava Benach, Sarah Pitney and Erica Reilly as partners. Its service branches distinguish family and LGBTQ immigration, business work, asylum, citizenship and immigration court.
Sources: Published practice and identity information: Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration · Checked October 25, 2026
What this guide covers
- The current name and current team matter to a referral
- Family documentation and LGBTQ-specific questions are related but not identical
- Court defense and an asylum inquiry need a procedural location
- Business clients and individual applicants bring different records
- Use a legacy referral without importing its assumptions
At a glance
- The current practice name differs from older Collopy references.
- The site identifies the present partners and other team roles.
- Family, protection and court services have separate branches.
Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration
- Source checked
- October 25, 2026
The current name and current team matter to a referral
The Washington website now uses Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration and identifies Ava Benach, Sarah Pitney and Erica Reilly as partners. The page also describes other attorneys and a separate paralegal team. A person following an older Benach Collopy reference can therefore connect the historical name with a present first-party source instead of assuming that an old PDF identifies the current organization unchanged. The service navigation separates family immigration, LGBTQ immigration, employment and business visas, asylum, citizenship, and immigration-court work.
Family documentation and LGBTQ-specific questions are related but not identical
The presence of both family and LGBTQ service headings gives a reader two ways to describe an inquiry. One concerns the civil relationship and the relatives involved; another may concern how the family's records or circumstances should be understood in an immigration process. A marriage certificate, a child's parentage record and a name-change document describe different events. Identifying the actual document avoids making assumptions about a relationship from names or appearance. The useful comparison is whether the practice's published experience addresses the factual question being raised, while the legal significance of a particular relationship remains an individual assessment.
Court defense and an asylum inquiry need a procedural location
Benach's biography on the homepage describes removal work, and the practice lists asylum separately from immigration court and deportation. A person who has received a court notice should preserve that notice as a court document even if the broader concern is protection from harm. A pending agency application and a scheduled hearing are not the same procedural event. An inquiry can identify whether a case is before USCIS, EOIR or another tribunal without sending a complete sensitive narrative in an opening message. This distinction helps avoid discussing an asylum case as though its location and current stage were already obvious.
Business clients and individual applicants bring different records
The employment and business branch appears alongside family and citizenship work, so a comparison should distinguish who is seeking the service. An employer's proposed position, a beneficiary's immigration record and a family member's application can be connected while remaining separate factual objects. A business inquiry can identify the entity and proposed work; an individual inquiry can identify the current document and the event prompting review. Neither the firm's broad menu nor its current partnership name establishes that one engagement includes all related people or all later applications. The first useful question is the specific work the published branch would address.
Use a legacy referral without importing its assumptions
An older referral may preserve a lawyer's name, a former practice name or an old description of services. The present website is the better source for the current public roster and service map. Keep the old reference only as a record of how the practice was found; connect any new inquiry to the present identity. The DC Bar directory and EOIR resources supply distinct public routes for professional and authorized-representation research. This approach is particularly useful for Benach Pitney Reilly because the first-party site expressly reflects a changed name, while its practice includes family, humanitarian and court-related work that should not be merged into one undifferentiated matter.
| Research item | Observed or proposed use | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Practice routing | family and LGBTQ immigration | Not a case-acceptance commitment |
| Second scope question | employment visas and asylum | Ask if this stage is included |
| Other published context | citizenship and immigration-court defense | No personal eligibility conclusion |
Prepare your next questions
0 of 6 complete
Download the designed PDF checklist to mark on screen or print. Your selections on this page stay here.
Version: October 25, 2026.
Go to the source
Sources & verification
Follow the institution that owns the requirement and check its current instructions.
Common questions
How do I identify the current Benach Pitney Reilly practice after an older Benach Collopy referral?
The current DC site uses Benach Pitney Reilly and identifies Ava Benach, Sarah Pitney and Erica Reilly as partners. Its service branches distinguish family and LGBTQ immigration, business work, asylum, citizenship and immigration court.
Sources: Published practice and identity information: Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration
Which partners appear on the current site?
The homepage identifies Ava Benach, Sarah Pitney and Erica Reilly as partners. This current roster helps connect a legacy referral to the organization now publishing its service information.
Sources: Published practice and identity information: Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration
Are family and LGBTQ immigration separate headings?
Yes. Both appear in the service map alongside business, asylum, citizenship and court work. Civil relationship, parentage and name records may present different factual questions within those branches.
Sources: Published practice and identity information: Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration
Does an older Benach Collopy reference identify the current practice unchanged?
Use the current first-party identity rather than assume the older name is unchanged. Retain the old reference as a discovery lead and connect the new inquiry to the present team.
Sources: Published practice and identity information: Benach Pitney Reilly Immigration
About this guide
By Immigrant Insider editorial desk. Updated .
Report outdated information